Evidences

In less then 24hrs of India submitting the evidences related to Pakistani involvement in the 26/11 attack to Pakistan. They have not only raised the question on evidences but also once again denied any involvement of any Pakistan in planning, control or support for the attack.

Is this an indication that Pakistan has better investigating agencies that can verify evidences in less then 24 hrs while Indian counter part took 40 days to collect them?
Or is it that the Pakistani agencies had enough time to destroy all the scenarios linked to the evidences presented by India? In both the cases I think Pakistani’s are more capable then Indian counterparts. They are not only aggressive in speech but also in action.

Now think if you say a lie with force people will tend to believe it but if you say a truth in low but formal voice with jittery words people will consider it to be formal, perfunctory or concocted for a specific reason.

Its time we Indian act as leaders, our action should speak rather then our words. I don’t encourage pulling the trigger but to pull some muscles and have dialogue with Pakistan face to face. Its time we should believe on our own capabilities and use international pressure as our support rather then relying on international support.

Leaders don’t follow they make people follow them.